Design and
Build of a Small Airship
(Commenced: 01-Jan-2007,Concluded: 12-Dec-2007)
|
|
Four
distinct flight regimes were considered: takeoff, hover, cruise and landing.
Flight parameters such as maximum speed, cruise altitude and takeoff time were
defined so that a theoretical force analysis could be conducted. The thrust
required in each flight regime was then determined based on calculation of
the lift, weight and drag forces. Four
sections were identified as crucial in the airship design: the envelope,
gondola, propulsion system and control system. An iterative procedure was
developed to optimise the envelope design based on the weight of components
and the lifting force needed to achieve neutral buoyancy. The conceptual
design of the gondola focussed on reducing weight whilst still having enough
strength to support the weight of the internal components. Ducted fans
powered by electric motors were chosen to provide propulsion to the airship.
The effects of different fan arrangements on airship manoeuvrability were
then analysed. The thrust output of the ducted fans was controlled by manual
and automatic systems. An RC hand unit provided full manual control while the
cruise altitude and pitch of the airship were maintained automatically using
an ultrasonic sensor and clinometer, respectively. The
detailed design was developed using the most suitable concept design
alternatives. Components such as motors, fans, batteries and automatic control
parts were selected based on technical suitability and budget limitations.
The final design used a commercially manufactured envelope propelled by four
ducted fans, each with variable thrust output. Two manually controlled fans
on the side of the gondola were used for yaw control while two downward
facing fans provide upward thrust and pitch control. Testing
of all individual components was conducted prior to testing of the completed
airship. This ensured that the ducted fans, radio controller, camera and
automatic control system operated correctly. Two airship envelopes were
manufactured and each was tested in a full flight test with the gondola
attached. The two flight tests demonstrated that the automatic control system
functioned as designed and could be used simultaneously with the manual
control system. The flight tests also showed that the airship was capable of
meeting the performance requirements set in the project definition. The majority of the project goals were achieved in the two flight tests.
It is hoped that the work undertaken in the project could be adapted and
refined by final year students in the future to design an airship capable of
outdoor flight with a more advanced control system.
Project DeliverablesImage Galleries: |
![]()
Copyright © 2008 The University of Adelaide